Filed under: Baseball | Tags: Dave Duncan, Joe Pettini, John Mozeliak, Jose Oquendo, Mike Matheny, St. Louis Cardinals, Tony La Russa
I don’t know if anyone noticed, but something’s been going on over in the sports section of STLtoday. It began a week ago, with reports that former Cardinals catcher Mike Matheny would be interviewed as a possible replacement for Tony La Russa.
Perhaps this didn’t come as a huge surprise to a lot of people. Matheny was a well-respected leader on the team many years ago. He was hard-nosed and competitive. Even then, there was talk that he would make a good coach or manager some day. But on closer examination, it was a little unusual.
Matheny hasn’t been a manager in the minors, like Ryne Sandberg, Chris Maloney, or even Joe McEwing. He hasn’t been a coach with the current Cards club like Jose Oquendo or Joe Pettini. And he certainly doesn’t have the big league pedigree of Terry Francona or Joe Maddon.
Matheny’s coaching experience, as far as I know, is limited to a few years as a spring training instructor and a series of videos for Protege Sports. Does that mean he’d be a bad manager? Of course not. I’m actually an advocate of signing an inexperienced manager because someone without a history is going to cost less. And I don’t think that the manager is terribly important. As long as he gets along with his players and doesn’t make too many horrible mistakes, he probably has less effect on the success of the team than the backup catcher or mopup reliever. There’s no reason to break the bank on a manager.
I’m in a pretty small minority with that viewpoint, however. So it was a bit unusual to me that the Cardinals, fresh off a WS victory, would consider replacing a high profile manager like La Russa with a complete rookie. I didn’t think too much about it, though. I honestly thought that they were interviewing Matheny as a courtesy or a curiosity. At that point, I assumed that Oquendo, Sandberg, and Francona were the real candidates.
Then STLtoday featured an article which detailed Matheny’s interview with the Cards. This piece highlighted his positive attributes, addressed his lack of experience, and was quick to point out Matheny’s bonds with Dave Duncan, Yadier Molina, and of course Albert Pujols.
Once again, this was only slightly unusual at the time. But now, almost a week later, there haven’t been any similar articles about the other candidates. There have, however, been stories considering the merit of hiring an inexperienced manager as well as a Bernie Miklasz article contemplating Matheny as a potential choice.
If you’re as cynical as me, you realize that STLtoday might be floating a trial balloon. They might be preparing Cardinals fans for what they already know or suspect: Mike Matheny is the frontrunner to replace Tony La Russa. We’ve certainly seen it before. Rasmus’s departure came on the heels of various stories about his difficulty with the Cardinals coaching staff. McGwire was floated as a potential hitting coach in the news before he was hired. Are we seeing that same thing now? And why?
Why Matheny? Why would the Cardinals–who have spent the last 16 years demonstrating that they value the position of manager far too much–hire a completely inexperienced skipper?
Two possibilities come to mind:
1. This may be an unfortunate response to a crisis of leadership. The Cardinals have been Tony La Russa’s team for so long that they might not know how to live without him. Perhaps they hope to keep his reign alive as long as possible by hiring a figurehead manager, and allowing Duncan and McGwire to make the real calls. This isn’t a particularly flattering analysis for Matheny, but it is something that should be considered. Matheny is a blank slate, and perhaps the Cardinals want to shape his future with the help of La Russa’s old coaches.
Of course, if this was the goal, why not hire Joe Pettini? He’s filled in for La Russa numerous times. He probably knows La Russa’s style better than anyone but Duncan. He’d be the natural fit if you wanted to ensure maximum continuity. Which leaves me with…
2. This is Mozeliak’s power play. And it’s really goddamn interesting. When Walt Jocketty was dismissed following the 2007 season and replaced with Jon Mozeliak, I assumed the new GM was nothing but a puppet for Tony La Russa. Jocketty left over disputes with management. Mozeliak was an org team player. Throughout his time with the Cardinals, he’s been at La Russa’s beck and call. He traded Brendan Ryan and Colby Rasmus. He acquired Matt Holliday, Ryan Theriot and Lance Berkman. The media made no attempts to conceal where these moves truly originated. La Russa wanted these players (or he wanted them gone) and Mozeliak made it happen.
Now La Russa’s gone. There’s a power vacuum. And I think this is a surprising move from Mozeliak to come out of the shadows and establish that he’s no longer just an apparatus of a larger-than-life manager.
How do I figure this? A little tidbit that has come out into the public eye since this search began. Mike Matheny has been working for Mozeliak, in the GM’s office, for the last year or so. Think about this quote from the above-mentioned Miklasz article:
“He’s also served as an adviser to Mozeliak. An unofficial assistant GM, if you will.”
Interesting, right? Pettini and Oquendo are acolytes of La Russa. They worked on the field with him. McEwing and Sandberg are managerial prospects from the White Sox and Phillies, respectively. Terry Francona would bring his own people in. But Mike Matheny? He’s been working with Mozeliak.
There is still no predicting who will be the Cards’ manager in a few days. But I think that Matheny’s sudden ascension to front-runner shows that Mozeliak is ready to make the Cardinals his team. For better or worse.
Filed under: Baseball | Tags: Jake Westbrook, John Mozeliak, Ryan Ludwick, Trading Deadline, Transactions
Since the start of the 2008 season, Ludwick ranks second in RBIs, third in homers and fourth in slugging percentage among NL outfielders.
Charles Fick in AA/AAA is the same age as Klubel and, again, has a similar career. Who the hell is Charles Fick? Yeah, I don’t really know either. But that’s the point. Cleveland essentially took a nobody for Westbrook. A PJ Walters or Charles Fick. Why did we have to trade Ludwick? We didn’t. It was a stupid trade. We could have and should have gotten Westbrook for a song. Instead, we traded our starting RF.